The first TW: Warhammer was a DX11 game was It's unfortunate because Creative Assembly themselves have acknowledged the CPU-bound nature of their games, and with re-use of game engines as spin-offs, DX12 optimization would have continued to provide benefits, especially if the future of graphics in RTS-type games will lean towards low-level APIs.There are now three benchmarks with varying graphics and processor loads; we've opted for the Battle benchmark, which appears to be the most graphics-bound.
Last in our 2018 game suite is Total War: Warhammer II, built on the same engine of Total War: Warhammer. They will focus on 2000 series and with that the gap going to increase a lot.Actually I don't and there is also no data to back up what you're saying. Please I agree with the conclusion that these cards aren't a good buy for 1080ti owners. Total War: WARHAMMER II - Skaven benchmark, 1080p MAX preset, Ryzen R7 Pro 1700X @3900, DDR4@3600 (micron Rev.E), RTX2080 Stock. or drag an image. Update avatar. And when we could expect maxwell (980/980ti) results to appear in GPU 2018 bench? PNG, GIF, JPG, or BMP. So a somewhat disappointing gain but having said that 83 fps on average at 4K using the extreme preset is a thing of beauty.Now if your wondering why I’m testing with War Thunder, it’s because this was one of the most heavily requested games we include in this big benchmark. File must be atleast 160x160px and less than 600x600px. Also as usual the 2080 Ti is seen well out in front, though having said that it wasn’t quite 30% faster, so let’s move on to see if it fairs any better at the 4K resolution.Mmm nope, not really. Total War™: WARHAMMER® Total War™: Attila Total War™: Rome II Total War™ Battles: Shogun Total War™: Shogun 2 Gold Edition Empire: Total War™ Buy Now . I’ve personally never played it but seems a lot of you do, so here are the 1440p results. The 2080 Ti was just 26% faster than the 1080 Ti but with frame rates never dipping below 100 fps the experience was pretty amazing, albeit only a fraction better than what was possible with the 1080 Ti.Moving along the next game we have to check out is Sniper Elite 4 using DX12 with Async Compute enabled. Still if you want to play Warhammer II at 4K in all of it’s glory then there’s no better choice, personally I’d just lower the quality preset a notch and save myself enough money to take a short holiday.Maxed out For Honor isn’t the most taxing title and we see that both the 1080 Ti and 2080 are able to maintain over 100 fps at all times when testing at 1440p using the extreme preset. Games . While there is a more recent Total War title, Total War Saga: Thrones of Britannia, that game was built on the 32-bit version of the engine. My 1080ti overclocks very nicely and I'll be happy to stick with it until the next generation in 7 nm. Next up we have Warhammer II and here the 2080 basically mirrors the 1080 Ti’s performance, something we’re used to seeing at this point.

By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated At 1080p, the cards quickly run into the CPU bottleneck, which is to be expected with top-tier video cards and the CPU intensive nature of RTS'es. Meanwhile the 2080 was 35% faster than the 1080, so decent gains but not the 40-50% Nvidia were promising.The 2080 Ti pushed up over 100 fps on average in Middle-earth Shadow of War at 1440p and that’s a steller result, despite only beating the 1080 Ti by a 31% margin. Total War: Warhammer II (DX11) Last in our 2018 game suite is Total War: Warhammer II, built on the same engine of Total War: Warhammer. Add at least 980Ti and 780TiYou'll be glad to hear then that we'll be backfilling cards.Many thanks for that, I think it is useful job, people are still using maxwell(or even older) generation GPU in 2018. If you enjoy our content, please consider subscribing... Here it’s exactly 30% faster than the 1080 Ti which is obviously a huge increase, but it’s not exactly aligned with the current 70% increase in price. The features don't justify the cost.There wont be driver&optimization support for 1000 series. It does seem so strange constantly referring to 30% gains as ‘only’ or ‘just’ but you have to do that when you’re talking about such a massive increase in price.Moving up to 4K does help the 2080 Ti further distance itself from the 1080 Ti, here it’s 40% faster and again while an awesome performance boost, it’s almost a break even scenario in terms of MSRP.Same Laptop, Different CPU: Ryzen 4000 vs. Intel 10th-gen BattleEpic Games files a lawsuit against Apple following Fortnite's App Store removalMicrosoft removes driver updates via Windows 10 Device Manager We’ve updated our terms. Hey i recently just purchased a RTX 2080 and running the benchmark on ultra settings at 1440p i got an average of 74fps with dx11 which i was happy with. Browse. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate. Games; Community; Support; Wiki; … By then we might have a decent selection of games that make use of ray tracing and the performance increase will be more appealing.Yah i agree, especially its only a 20-25fps increase on average. Still the 30% performance uplift for the 2080 over the 1080 will be welcomed by those by high refresh rate monitors, but I guess you already had the 1080 Ti offering that kind of performance, so the 2080 really adds no real value here.Of course at 4K we see much the same, the 2080 isn’t able to beat the 1080 Ti while the 2080 Ti was just 28% faster. Posted by bryanwhite1911: “rtx 2080 horrible fps in warhammer total war 2 and thrones Britannia m” Posted by bryanwhite1911: “rtx 2080 horrible fps in warhammer total war 2 and thrones Britannia memory leak” Profile.
It seems were limited to just shy of 160 fps at this resolution using the highest quality preset, so not much to discuss here, let’s check out the 4K results.Okay so now we’re seeing a good amount of separation, the 2080 of course matched the 1080 Ti, making it 35% faster than the 1080. Especially in regards to mid-range and older parts. Update avatar.