The Hino company itself dates back to 1910, with the model TGE *A-type* truck the first motor vehicle produced by them in 1917.The Mitsubishi Fuso Truck was first released in 1984 and was the successor to the FK series, in 1988 the Mitsubishi Fuso FM Series was launched with their parent company Daimler AG manufacturing the engine. It removes the partiality of internal tests and unreliable results of internal OEM testing.In the past year we have heard from customers telling us of improved fuel economy compared to their EPA07 engine Fuso trucks and measurable fuel cost savings,” said Mike Rumsey, VP of Sales. Thread starter humble1; Start date Jun 21, 2015; 1; 2; 3; Next. Whether you’re saving money at the gas station or settling in to a comfortable set of Air Ride seats, the truck you choose decides if you win or lose. The 4.0-litre turbo-diesel engine delivers 110kW, the same as the other two, but has 45-50Nm extra torque. See how these Class 6 diesel truck options face-off when put back to back: Hino 268: 220-260 HP @ 2500 RPM, 6 Cylinder Diesel Engine, 9,000 lb MAX Payload, Long list of standard & optional interior options. Fuso vs Isuzu. If grunt is your big thing, the Hino easily outclasses its Isuzu and Fuso competitors. Based in Japan, Hino motors have produced the Hino Ranger, and it is the only truck in Japan offering an automatic transmission. Hino 268 vs. Isuzu FTR. The HVAC system is high capacity and is designed for a more extended period, allowing you to do business with the cab easily. Jun 21, 2015 #1 Anybody have mpg info on these? Based in Japan, Hino motors have produced the Hino Ranger, and it is the only truck in Japan offering an automatic transmission. Mobileye is perfect to protect against vehicle collisions or possible pedestrian and highway separation. Inventory Contact. Mitsubishi declared that after the test, the Fuso scored fuel consumption of only 12.331 mpg which was better with 8.45% than the Isuzu NPR-HD that has achieved a fuel consumption of 11.370 mpg. The intelligent Hino offers a fuel saving torque converter allowing the driver to adopt the driving style of an automatic transmission. This truck is comfortable to ride in and comes in six different wheelbase lengths with tiny front airbagsOver the years Fuso has worked on fuel consumption and comes in 117HP and 175HP engines if you are looking for a medium-sized truck the Mitsubishi Fuso is a perfect option. The system has been tested within the Fuso fleet, research discovering that any risky driver behaviour can be reduced by using this system – making it one of the best safety features in the Fuso range.Both vehicles have pluses and minuses – Hino has better fuel economy.

Mitsubishi Vs Hino Trucks. Hino 268 and Isuzu FTR deliver more strength and a higher payload for heavier hauling. Find wide variety used cars from used car auctions and sale. humble1 LawnSite Silver Member.

course in various driving situations.Mitsubishi declared that after the test, the Fuso scored fuel consumption of only 12.331 mpg which was better with 8.45% than the Isuzu NPR-HD that has achieved a fuel consumption of 11.370 mpg.Mitsubishi declared that the test was conducted in accordance with SAE J1321 Type II Fuel Consumption Test procedures, and included multiple runs conducted over several days.

When it comes to medium sized Hino trucks, capacity wise it is average and is only useful for transportation – moving goods from one place to another.Safety – the driver can easily control the Hino Ranger as it’s security control has been designed to keep the vehicle stable when driven, when passing on a curve it will help keep the vehicle stabilised, if, a slip is caused by the vehicle the respective The Mitsubishi Fuso has alerts for speeding with *mobile eye* – an alternate feature. LCF commercial trucks like the 2018 Isuzu NPR don’t have as many rivals as passenger cars and regular pickup trucks do, but the rivalry is even fiercer. Hino Ranger vs Mitsubishi Fuso - Comparison of Price, Specs And Fuel Consumption In MPG. To see how good the NPR is, let’s put it head-to-head against the Mitsubishi Fuso 160 in this comparison guide to see which is the superior model for your business. The engine is suitable for long-distance driving and is low noise with minimal vibrations. Automotive Testing and Development Services (ATDS) has made a comparison test between the Mitsubishi Fuso and Isuzu NPR-HD.Both vehicles were loaded with 14.490 lbs and were tested under identical conditions over a 97.4-mi.

Let’s take a look at the Mitsubishi Fuso Vs the Hino Ranger; these are two heavy flatbed trucks. 1 of 3 Go to page. Fuso vs Isuzu [vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Truckers know that the comfort and functionality of a truck is the cornerstone for a successful fleet.

Looking for more power? Go. A factor in that difference is the Isuzu and Fuso engines are only 3.0 litres and any drive makes it clear the Hino is better suited to the heavy end of delivery activity.